Recap: Previously, the last post was on 2 chat logs regarding two married men (meaning with wives mind u!) who inititated a meeting with us on the mirc. We had given a venue for the meeting. This post is the follow up of the meeting held this afternoon :)
Before the meeting, we had phoned the two men regarding the meeting using fake accents depending on the alterego described to them. Victim 9 was expecting sex; during the call, he insistingly questioned the afternoon's activities hinting towards sexual contempt. Victim 8, however we have decided to drop his case due to his sincerity in meeting but a packed afternoon ahead of him.
He came.....but she didn't come
Our target walked through the doors of the venue suggested at 12.30pm sharp, heading to the toilets straight away. He spent considerable amounts of time in the bathroom, later started walking out of the venue to peek in.
12.39pm
he later came back into the venue to set up his laptop and got himself a drink
12.57pm
1.12pm
Our target spent an hour waiting for the "girl" to turn up for possible sex with her. This actually saddens the crew who is responsible for this blog as it clearly shows that most mirc people do turn up for their meetings. Imagine it to be a naive girl who turned up to meet this man instead. What kind of consequences this meeting, would resulted in?
Every chat we have encountered have ended up in the males initiating sex regardless of situations. This adds up to the problem that police and media have been countlessly warning teenagers in particular about. However, many dismiss these warnings.
This blog acknowledges the fact that there are males who are just looking for a decent chat. These guys that we are exposing, on the contrary, actually have disgraced their own gender causing girls to sterotype all males as cheating, lying bastards. We may be mean bitches but we cannot stomach the thought of married men actually going on MIRC (#teens) to clinch an easy fling with a young girl. This is an insult to us girls emotionally, interllectually and physically. The way they seem to have degrade us by paying for sex and asking for it liberally on the net without even getting to know us for more than 5 mins is intolerable and unacceptable. Without these men like these, we never would have guessed how ugly and dirty the MIRC has become.
she left that guy dangling naked, with nowhere to hide his bits 4:09 PM
WebWhore
who's your daddy mama?
_that sexy devil behind the screen_
A crew of girls setting out to fish out the moral wrongs of internet meetings and what really goes on during the chat.
These men have shamed the name of the male gender.
Regardless of legal or illegal age for the males requesting for sex, it is a downright insult to females to have men asking for sex within 2 mins into an introduction.
Females deserve more respect than being used as a sex toy, satisfying male sexual urges.
We bring to you the uncensored ugliness of the internet chatzone that the media has failed to bring to our attention
Society may be more open today but it does not give anyone the right to assume that females can be treated as commodities that can be bought off the shelf nor that females are stores which men can walk in and out of whenever they fancy.
UPDATES! (23 Feb 2007)
We'll be on Channel News Asia's Blogtv.sg
Watch for what others and we have to say on 27th Feb (next tuesday), 8.30pm
this blog should serve as an educational eye opener to the singapore virtual chatzone particularly to the young ladies exploring the world of net-meeting
This blog is crude, obnoxious and does not care for any resemblance in chat patterns observed.
Thats how the real world is like
What you see may not be what you get
this site serves as a warning to all the men out there
that whoever you're chatting with might not
be a sweet pussy but a conviving one
Whatever your mother tells you about the
dangers of internet chatroom meeting...
...she is not joking nor exaggerating
enjoy your stay here.
Get to know more about why, how, when this blog was created and its aims before e-mailing any questions:
